Is Kibble Really the McDonald’s of Dog Food? Why the Fast Food Comparison Doesn’t Add Up
Many dog owners compare kibble to McDonald’s or fast food, but is that really fair? This blog explains why kibble isn’t the canine equivalent of junk food, explores where the comparison comes from, and highlights what really counts as “dog junk food.”
Where the “Kibble = McDonald’s” Idea Comes From
If you’ve spent any time in dog nutrition groups, you’ll have seen the phrase:
“Feeding kibble is like giving your dog McDonald’s every day.”
At first glance, it sounds convincing. After all, both kibble and fast food are:
Convenient
Processed
Packaged
Readily available
For a worried dog owner who just wants to do right by their pet, the comparison feels logical. It plays on something most of us already know — that eating too much fast food isn’t good for human health. So naturally, when we hear kibble described this way, alarm bells ring.
And let me be clear: I completely understand why so many owners end up here. You want to feed your dog well, you’ve read scary posts online, and you’re trying to make sense of it all. I’ve spoken to countless clients who’ve felt guilty for feeding kibble because of this exact analogy.
But here’s the truth: comparing kibble to McDonald’s simply doesn’t add up. Not scientifically, not nutritionally, and not logically. In fact, it often distracts from the real issue — which is knowing how to identify truly poor-quality foods and treats.
Why the McDonald’s Analogy Catches On
The McDonald’s comparison is a classic case of a metaphor that sounds catchy but falls apart under scrutiny. Still, it’s important to understand why dog owners use it.
Here are the main reasons:
1. Both Are Processed
Kibble is cooked, dried, and extruded into uniform pieces. Fast food is fried, grilled, or processed to be served quickly. To the average eye, “processing” equals “unhealthy.”
2. Both Are Convenient
Kibble is easy to store, scoop, and feed. Fast food is quick to grab on the way home. Convenience often carries a stigma of being “lazy” or “less nutritious.”
3. Both Are Marketed Heavily
Dog food brands advertise through TV, social media, and vets. McDonald’s is one of the biggest advertisers in the world. Heavy marketing can make people suspicious.
4. Both Can Feel “Generic”
McDonald’s meals look the same everywhere. Kibble pellets look uniform regardless of the ingredients inside. This fuels the perception of “factory food.”
So, it’s not hard to see why the comparison is tempting. But when we move past surface appearances and actually look at the nutrition, the whole idea collapses.
Why Kibble ≠ McDonald’s
Here’s where we need to separate fact from fiction.
1. Kibble Is Formulated to Be Complete and Balanced
McDonald’s meals are not designed to meet 100% of your daily nutrient needs. They’re calorie-dense, high in fat and salt, and low in fibre and essential micronutrients.
Kibble, on the other hand, is formulated to meet FEDIAF (Europe) or AAFCO (US) nutrient profiles. That means:
Correct levels of protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals
Controlled calcium and phosphorus ratios for bone health
Essential amino acids like taurine and methionine included
Life-stage specific adjustments
Put simply: you could feed kibble alone and your dog would meet their nutritional needs. You couldn’t say the same if a person ate only McDonald’s
2. Fast Food Is Excessively High in Fat, Salt, and Sugar
A typical McDonald’s meal can easily exceed a human’s daily sodium recommendation in one sitting. Add to that high saturated fat, added sugars, and refined carbs, and you’ve got a recipe for long-term health problems if eaten daily.
Kibble, however:
Has regulated fat levels (usually 8–20% on a dry matter basis)
Contains controlled sodium levels to protect heart and kidney health
Contains no added sugars (outside of small amounts in some treats)
3. Kibble Undergoes Processing — But Not the Same Kind
The extrusion process used for kibble involves cooking ingredients under high heat and pressure. This ensures safety (kills pathogens like Salmonella) and digestibility
Fast food is often deep-fried, high in trans fats, and may contain carcinogenic compounds from repeated oil use.
So while both are “processed,” the type and purpose of processing is very different.
4. McDonald’s Is “Empty Calories” — Kibble Is Not
A McDonald’s cheeseburger offers plenty of calories but very few essential vitamins, minerals, or fibre.
Kibble is fortified with vitamins and minerals. Dogs eating kibble are not typically nutrient-deficient unless there’s an underlying medical condition
5. Feeding Kibble Daily Is Normal — Fast Food Daily for every meal is different
Dogs evolved alongside humans, scavenging from cooked foods . They thrive on consistent, balanced diets.
Humans, on the other hand, thrive on variety. Eating the same McDonald’s meal daily would inevitably cause nutrient imbalances.
The Dangers of the McDonald’s Comparison
So, why does it matter if people call kibble “dog junk food”?
Because it:
Shames owners unnecessarily. Many feel guilty or anxious even when feeding a good-quality kibble.
Pushes owners towards unsafe alternatives. Some switch to unbalanced raw or home-cooked diets without guidance, leading to deficiencies
Distracts from real red flags. Instead of learning how to spot poor ingredients or excess fat/salt, owners get stuck on false analogies.
When we oversimplify, we risk making nutrition less accessible, not more.
So What Would Be a Fair “Junk Food” Comparison for Dogs?
If we want to draw comparisons, let’s make them accurate.
Dog “Junk Food” Looks More Like:
High-fat dog chews (pig ears, rawhide twists, deep-fried treats)
Processed meat snacks (sausages, “hot dog” style treats for dogs)
High-salt treats (jerky treats not formulated for dogs, cured meats)
High-sugar bakery treats (iced biscuits, pupcakes with added sweeteners)
These are much closer to the “fast food” model:
Calorie-dense
High in fat/salt/sugar
Low in micronutrients
Not intended as a full diet
They’re fine in moderation, but overfeeding them absolutely mirrors what would happen if a person ate McDonald’s daily for EVERY meal
A Better Analogy for Kibble
So if kibble isn’t McDonald’s, what is it?
The better comparison would be:
A nutritionally balanced meal replacement shake
Infant formula (formulated to be complete when fed alone)
These foods are:
Processed, yes — but specifically designed to be safe, digestible, and balanced
Consistent in nutrients
Able to sustain life as a sole food source
That’s a much closer picture of what kibble truly is.
Understanding the Spectrum of Kibble Quality
Of course, not all kibble is created equal. Just as there are fortified cereals with wholegrains and those loaded with sugar, kibble varies in quality too.
Things to consider:
Carbohydrate quality: wholegrains, legumes, or fillers
Fat percentage: ideally below 16% dry matter for most healthy adults
Micronutrient balance: does it meet FEDIAF or AAFCO standards?
Additives: unnecessary colours, flavourings, or preservatives
Learning to read labels helps owners distinguish between lower and higher-quality kibble without falling into black-and-white thinking
Where Owners Should Focus Their Concern
Instead of worrying that kibble = McDonald’s, it’s more productive to focus on:
Calories: Is your dog at a healthy weight? Overweight dogs face greater health risks than any specific diet choice (Hand et al., 2010).
Nutrient Balance: Is the food complete and balanced according to recognised standards, health concerns and their life stage?
Digestibility: Does your dog have normal stools, coat condition, and energy levels?
Treat Choices: Are you accidentally undoing balance with high-fat, high-salt extras?
Supplements: Are you supplementing with purpose or relying on heavily marketed products to bridge gaps in a poor unbalanced diet?
Because here’s the reality: for most dogs, the treats they get from the table are far more damaging than their kibble.
Key Takeaways
The idea that kibble is “like McDonald’s” is catchy but misleading.
Kibble is nutritionally balanced and designed to sustain a dog’s health — McDonald’s isn’t designed to sustain a human’s.
The better “junk food” comparison lies with certain treats and chews, not kibble.
Owners should focus less on catchy analogies and more on evaluating food based on evidence: nutrient profiles, digestibility, and portion control.
Final Thoughts
It’s natural to want the best for your dog, and I respect the thought process behind the “kibble = McDonald’s” analogy. But understanding the science shows us it just doesn’t hold up.
Instead of feeling guilty (or making others feel this way), focus on what matters most: choosing a complete and balanced food, feeding the right portions, and keeping treats in check.
Because at the end of the day, nutrition isn’t about fear or catchy slogans — it’s about balance, evidence, and what helps your dog thrive.
References
FEDIAF. (2023). Nutritional Guidelines for Complete and Complementary Pet Food for Cats and Dogs.
AAFCO. (2024). Dog and Cat Food Nutrient Profiles.
Case, L. P., Daristotle, L., Hayek, M. G., & Raasch, M. F. (2011). Canine and Feline Nutrition. 3rd ed. Mosby Elsevier.
Hand, M. S., Thatcher, C. D., Remillard, R. L., Roudebush, P., & Novotny, B. J. (2010). Small Animal Clinical Nutrition. 5th ed. Mark Morris Institute.
Bosch, G., Hagen-Plantinga, E. A., & Hendriks, W. H. (2015). Dietary nutrient profiles of wild wolves: insights for optimal dog nutrition? British Journal of Nutrition, 113(S1), S40–S54.
NRC. (2006). Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. The National Academies Press.
Zicker, S. C. (2008). Evaluation of commercial diets and supplements for dogs and cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 233(11), 1699–1705.
Buff, P. R., Carter, R. A., Bauer, J. E., & Kersey, J. H. (2014). Natural pet food: A review of natural diets and their impact on canine and feline physiology. Journal of Animal Science, 92(9), 3781–3791.
Freeman, L. M., & Chandler, M. L. (2022). Nutritional myths and feeding practices in dogs and cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 63(2), 81–90.
Wenz, J. R., & Remillard, R. L. (2006). Safety of pet foods with reference to “junk food” claims. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 36(6), 1263–1277.
Complete the FREE DIET ASSESSMENT FORM and get back a report within 48 working hours from The Canine Dietitian
